click on the below button to pay money for coaching using a card or paypal

"Fabulous Storytelling" Mick Herron

I have been writing and publishing books on a variety of topics since my bestselling Angry White Pyjamas came out in 1997. Other bestsellers include Red Nile, a biography of the River Nile. In total I have written 15 mainstream books translated into 16 languages. The include creative non-fiction, novels, memoir, travel and self-help. My publishers include Harper Collins, Picador, Penguin and Hachette. I have won several awards including two top national prizes- the Somerset Maugham literary award and the William Hill sportsbook of the Year Award. I have also won the Newdigate Prize for poetry- one of the oldest poetry prizes in the world; past winners include Oscar Wilde, James Fenton and Fiona Sampson.

A more recent success was Micromastery, published by Penguin in the US and the UK as well as selling in eight other countries.

Micromastery is a way of learning new skills more efficiently. I include these methods when I coach people who want to improve as writers. If that's you, go to the section of this site titled I CAN HELP YOU WRITE. I have taught creative writing in schools and universities but I now find coaching and editing is where I can deliver the most value. In the past I have taught courses in both fiction and memoir at Moniack Mhor, the former Arvon teaching centre in Scotland.

MICROMASTERY ON AMAZON

"Micromastery is a triumph. A brilliant idea, utterly convincing, and superbly carried through" - Philip Pullman

Subscribe FOR FREE to the Micromastery Newsletter HERE

My instagram account is roberttwiggerinstantart HERE

Friday
Jul132012

Lightness versus heaviness

We all know people who are ‘too heavy’. You may know people who by their studied attempts to be light hearted actually weigh things down, as if their very shallowness masks an inner lugubriousness, a real heaviness.

In truth, it’s rare to be light. To be someone providing light, who has a light touch, who is, in this way, enlightened.

Light people provide light. They make things seem easy. They stop obscurity. They don’t hide from facing up to life. They have an easy optimism. They make a joke of grind.

I think light people actually beam a kind of light outwards. They are generous. Taking, calculating, getting your ‘fair share’ are all heavy, all self-obsessed. Generousity is not only about giving, therefore lightening your load, its about focusing outwards, giving others impetus, making them lighter too.

Because the best quality of light people is that they lighten our load too, they make our lives less dim, lighter in terms of visibility and lighter in terms of the weight upon our shoulders.

How do the enlightened beam light at us? Quite literally by sending their light out, their affection, their generousity.

This is the start of lightness- giving things away without wanting anything in return. Lightening your own stash. The more you can give away the lighter you become.

Light people characteristically arrive unexpectedly and leave quickly having greeted everyone most fulsomely, spread a little light everywhere. They do not overstay, nor leave early just because that is the done thing. Lightness and an impeccable sense of timing and an absence of greed are all connected and maybe worth contemplating.

Thursday
Jul122012

Tahir's Shah's Timbuctoo

I am currently completely swept away by Tahir Shah's novel Timbuctoo. Odd that Timbuctoo is again very much in the news, his story follows the amazing adventures of the first European to visit this fabled city. This book is an incredible production, beautiful maps, wonderful paper...worth getting at: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Timbuctoo-Tahir-Shah/dp/0957242905/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1339022075&sr=8-1

Monday
Jul092012

do the maths

85% of us rate ourselves as happier than average...

Friday
Jul062012

you can't take it with you

We are born greedy. We want it all. The success, the house, the car, the family. We’re told that we deserve it by a thousand messages, subliminal or otherwise, beamed through the airwaves and newspapers. The notion of sacrifice, not as some emotion laden term, but a simple technical description of leaving some things out and taking other things with you, is all but lost.

One of my favourite Mulla Nasrudin stories features the Mulla watching his friend Wali making yoghurt. He observes how Wali adds a little live yoghurt culture to milk to make a large amount of yoghurt. Nasrudin asks Wali for some yoghurt culture and peels off. Next day Wali sees Nasrudin down by the lake carefully adding yoghurt culture to the great expanse of water. “What are you doing?” he asks. “Making yoghurt,” replied Nasrudin with a far off look in his eyes. “But that’ll never work!” expostulated Wali. “I know,” agreed Nasrudin, “But just imagine if it did!”

We want it all, and we can con ourselves we can get it until we come against a real limiting reality- such as having to carry our entire lives in a rucksack.

Bed. Food. Water. Clothes. Shelter. Kindle if you’re lucky.

And if it weighs much more than twelve kilograms you’ll be suffering. That’s right, get your life down to 12kg. It’s not only possible there are some ultralight backpackers out there who carry three days worth of food and EVERYTHING ELSE in a pack weighing 5kg.

It’s just about realising you can’t have it all.

To get down to the required weight you bite it off from both ends: finding the lightest version of everything and working what you don’t need. You start to get clever and find things that do two things for the same weight: a poncho that becomes a tent, walking poles that work as tent poles, tent pegs you can use as a fire grill, a kindle you can use as, er, a kindle, until it gets wet and breaks and then you can use it as a weight to hold your tent flap open.

You find the lightest sleeping bag and tent. You work out you only need a pair of shorts and a pair of trousers- why not get the kind that zip off to make both. If you get wet you can loiter in your sleeping bag until your trousers have dried out. Or wear underpants that look like swimming trunks.

And so you whittle the weight down. You carry mainly dried food. You work out where your water stops are so you don’t need to over carry liquid. You carry a stove that works on wood as well as meths or solid fuel- thus reducing how much fuel you have to carry.

I’ve even heard of people cutting matches in half to save weight that way. A bit extreme perhaps, but once you start weight watching its hard to stop.

You find out that mostly, people carry too much. One test is, after a trip, to make three piles, the first is stuff used everyday, the second is stuff never used, and the third is stuff used once or twice. You ditch the last two piles and only take the first on your next trip.

By such exercises you begin to learn how much you need in life. Not much. As long as you are moving forward along your path you need only that which keeps you going. It isn’t that different from your walking gear: shelter, bed, food, a few books instead of the kindle.

We accumulate stuff, tons of it, and it can very easily own us. Just looking at stuff, spread out round the house, can really drain you of energy. I deliberately write in a place devoid of any books, any clutter. It feels much freer, much lighter. As the saying goes: it’s easy to makes things heavier, the real skill is in making life lighter. Which brings us neatly to:

Tuesday
Jul032012

three rules of happiness

Happiness is a slippery word. We know what we mean by it when we use it, often in the negative- “So and so’s not happy” we say and everyone knows what we mean by it. Or, if asked by the waiter at the end of the meal “Were you happy with your meal?” we know exactly what is meant- especially if there was a curly hair in the boeuf bourguignon.

We're not so clear about more open ended usages. The word tends to get stretched out and over applied. People talk of ‘searching for happiness’, which conjures up images of looking for a lost child or maybe the gold at the end of the rainbow. There is much talk of some nations being ‘happier’ than others – but when you actually see how the survey was compiled you begin to doubt its utility.

You hear people say, at the end of a doomed relationship ‘you know I was never really happy’.

You hear people intone, ‘I just want to be happy. I deserve a little happiness.’

What they mean, often, is simply a reprieve of ill fortune, a let up in the bad luck or illness that has buffeted them. But when this let up happens they often still describe themselves as ‘unhappy’.

First Rule: happiness is a decision, first and foremost. By making this decision, even if it seems a tad over optimistic, you are laying claim to happiness as your right rather than something special. Travel the world and visit the poor places and you'll see happy faces everywhere. Ever seen rich people picking up their cars at valet parking? Miserable faces rule. You don't need anything to be happy. Even with poor health you can find happiness where you may not have expected to find it. You just need to decide.

Second Rule: everyone has a ‘main problem’- when it is solved, the problem lower down the list gets promoted and becomes the new ‘main problem.’ Such people go through their lives worrying about their ‘big’ problems. As they actually solve a lot of them you are left with the spectacle of someone worrying in old age about very trivial problems- a draught, food being late, a routine upset- these are the ‘main problems’ of someone who was rather successful at solving real problems during their life. What they lacked, crucially, was awareness of what was going on. They lacked what Adam Smith termed: the impartial spectator.

We know Adam Smith primarily from his theories in economics, but he also wrote on philosophy. He noted that in moral philosophy the key move is not to identify immutable rules- variations on the Mosaic code but with knobs on so to speak, but to take the more sophisticated route and look at how to improve one’s behaviour before devising a rule that ‘tells us what to do’. Mostly we know what to do- the problem is we don’t do it. We either allow ourselves to get carried away by others or we drown out the inner voice that tells us what we ought to do. Or, very often, we simply don’t put in place the external conditions needed to do the right thing. For example, if you know you fall over and hurt yourself when drunk, only drink at home in an empty room.

How do we improve? By simply using Adam Smith’s impartial spectator- that part of you that does not judge but simply notes ‘ah, you have just forgotten the keys again’, for example. No berating is necessary, indeed that seems to stop the magic from working. Because awareness is all you need. Once you are aware in a non-judgemental way of a problem it will fix itself, by which I mean YOU will fix it but not in the manner of an irritated parent lecturing a child for the nth time. The reason it works is that when you berate yourself you actually abolish the impact, you ‘punish’ yourself in order to be let off. But when you simply observe a defect and move on, cognitive dissonance works to solve the problem. Cognitive dissonance is powerful stuff- we are consistency loving creatures and when something deeply inconsistent is brought into our attention but with no absolving emotion attached we adjust to shift that bad behaviour from our lives.

Now, to get back to happiness, we can see that the impartial spectator, or observing self, needs to be used to improve one’s life. Using it, sharpens it. In traditional philosophy sharpening the clarity and force of the observing self  was called ‘polishing the mirror’. You can see why: the observing self mirrors what we do and shows up what we do for our own inspection. As long as we pay a bit of attention, as long as we are not in too much of a rush. Which brings us to the next rule.

Third Rule: Being in a bad rush is usually a bad idea.

There are good rushes- rushing for a train with a friend when it doesn’t matter if you miss it, rushing to get shopping done before a party- but mainly when we rush it’s neither fun, productive or inducing of anything we might term happiness. So to even get in the zone of examining happiness we need to cease being in a rush.

So what is it we are really talking about here?

Contentment? Flourishing as a human? Personal growth?

Or is it the absence of pain, noise, irritation?

Is happiness therefore better defined as our normal everyday human state which pertains as long as we don’t mess our lives up or clutter them too much.

I think this is true. Happiness is not something you get- like a new car or a cocaine high, it's something you have been given as part of the package of being human. We’re not so much better than dogs in this regard- and in many cases decidedly worse- since dogs are basically happy. Happiness is the default dog setting unless bad things happen repeatedly and that default setting gets reset.

Happiness is a decision. You may not be instantly happy having taken that decision. There may be all kinds of things in your life stopping you from feeling happy right here and now. But soon enough you will feel moments of happiness breaking through. Moments of euphoria may elude you, maybe it will simply be moments of contentment and deep pleasure but, like the sun behind clouds they will appear. And as you observe yourself better and better, solutions will impose themselves providing better and better glimpses of happiness.

But first comes the decision: I have decided in my life that I am happy.

Once that decision is made you will find yourself making yourself happy in whatever situation you find yourself. And we humans are very creative- we are actually pretty good at making something out of nothing. Once you have decided to be happy as your default setting you will find happy places to occupy wherever you are. You’ll make the best of things whatever they may be.

 

Thursday
Jun282012

a real japanese micro-adventure

Wednesday
Jun272012

Timbuctoo by Tahir Shah

Reading an early copy of Tahir Shah's novel Timbuctoo- incredible maps- intriguing story.