Slave?

"The unsuspecting Britons spoke of such novelties as civilisation, when in fact they were only a feature of their enslavement."

Tacitus. The Agricola

spiral thinking and walking

When we circle a subject we often end up going round and round in circles. When we spiral a subject we end up with a better result. Walking seems to add forward momentum to thinking- stretching a circle out into a spiral. Charles Dickens considered it 'immoral' to write for more hours than he walked. Walking was how he solved the problems which, sitting at a desk, would have just remained in a circle chasing its tail around his head. People have used walking to come up with new solutions for centuries but by adding the image of spiralling a subject as you walk you'll find your abilities to think things up kick started in a useful way.

stories

Another great Keith Johnstone insight: The improviser who does not tell stories is chained to the treadmill of always needing a 'better' joke.

no idea what to do?

A tip from Keith Johnstone: When you're improvising and have no idea what to do just say confidently to those waiting: "I know exactly what to do."

change your head to write well

The biggest failing in most novels and short stories is 'thinness'. 'Thickness' is obtained either through multiple sweeps adding material each time or getting into a 'thick head' so to speak. I find the feeling you have when you get up after an afternoon sleep ideal- no joke this- your head is dream laden, unflustered and focused on now not on the near future; looking even one sentence ahead is a sign of being too focused on the future.

allergies and caesarian sections

It seems that being born by Caesarian means a five times higher chance of developing in later life common allergies such as dust and mite allergies, according to a new US Study. Is it any surprise that births by C-section have risen in the US from 5% in 1970 to around 33% now- roughly a six fold increase. And we're not far behind in the UK.

what does reasonable mean?

Recently in the news there has been an extraordinary situation where a British jury asked the judge to explain to them the meaning of 'beyond reasonable doubt'. I think they knew what 'beyond' and 'doubt' meant so that leaves 'reasonable'. In every 'proper' job you are snowed with guidelines and definitions. The words 'use your judgement' or 'do what is reasonable' are rarely encountered. People don't trust other people 'below them' to use their judgement.

That slippery and attractive way of thinking - relativism- has penetrated into the roots of society. If all behaviour can be deemed 'reasonable' from some perspective or another, is it any surprise that the jury seek guidance on what kind of 'reasonableness' is intended. When cannibalism can be viewed as 'reasonable' within the tribal structure of New Guinea then the march of relatavism has started. The way out of the beguiling grip of relatavism is to stop worrying about yourself and your precious moral schemas and look outward at contexts, situations, what is really happening in the situation you are really concerned with. I suspect the problem with the jury was that they weren't able to 'get real' and look at this crime within its real life context. We all know what reasonable means when someone doesn't acknowledge us for holding the door open for them.